Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of ksh88
> licensing problems.  Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting
> course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn himsef!) told me I couldn't
> give people copies of the shell to take home.

AFAIR, ksh was OSS (but not using an OSI approved license) since 1997. Since 
2001, ksh is under a OSI approved license.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxx                    (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos