Initially Bourne was used because it was typically a static binary,
because the boot process didn't have access to any shared libraries.
When that changed it became a bit of a moot point, and you started to
see other interpreters being used.
Even though Solaris started using ksh as the default user environment,
almost all of the start scrips were either bourne or bash scripts. With
Bash having more functionality the scripts typically used the
environment that suited the requirements best.
Bottom line is use what ever script suits your needs just be sure to
tell the environment which interpreter to use. Personally I never write
a script that doesn't include the interpreter on the first line.
Pete
On 04/24/15 08:42, Eckert, Doug wrote:
It was the mid/late-90s, but I seem to recall Bourne being the default
shell, although sh/ksh/csh were all available with a typical install.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
If money can fix it, it's not a problem.
-- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
