Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people.
> >>
> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies.
> >
> > The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am not an OSS enemy:
> >
> >   http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue
>
> It is really the GPL that has the restriction preventing
> 'best-of-breed' components being combined, but it doesn't matter, it
> isn't going to change.   I can see Sun being irritated with Linux
> (and for good reason...) but isn't it time to let it go?

We had much less problems is the people that use the GPL would understand the 
GPL.

If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted "collective work" and the 
GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of 
course. 

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxx                    (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux