Re: The future of centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list
> > might have on this article I wrote for my new company.
> >
> > http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/


Surely a fair, balanced and proportionate investigation explores the
functionality of all the systems before determining the result ?

The web page begins "..... This article will make the business case for
“Enterprise Linux” distributions like Centos and RHEL."

That does seem biased because at that moment of restricting the result
to '2 operating systems only' no consideration of the alternatives have
been made *AND* the comparison criteria remains unknown and undeclared.

That methodology is not how a senior court judge would decide on an
issue.


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.      Je suis Charlie.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux