Re: The future of centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:32 AM, SilverTip257 <silvertip257@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list
>> might have on this article I wrote for my new company.
>>
>> http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/
>
>
> Well put.
> For a non-technical person, your brief clues them in to the differences
> between RHEL and CentOS.  And the reason both coexist.
>
> I do however agree with Valeri in that you probably (c|s)hould mention
> Debian in there somewhere.
> I realize you left Debian out because there is no official "enterprise"
> support entity as there is with Ubuntu.  So at that point, maybe it's not
> worth mentioning Debian?

Seems odd to mention Oracle's name at all in the link without pointing
out that they have a product very similar to CentOS with the option to
purchase support.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux