On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list
> might have on this article I wrote for my new company.
>
> http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/
Well put.
For a non-technical person, your brief clues them in to the differences
between RHEL and CentOS. And the reason both coexist.
I do however agree with Valeri in that you probably (c|s)hould mention
Debian in there somewhere.
I realize you left Debian out because there is no official "enterprise"
support entity as there is with Ubuntu. So at that point, maybe it's not
worth mentioning Debian?
>
>
> I for one welcome our Redhat overlords. I think they will provide better
> governance which should give Centos better credibility as an Enterprise,
> community supported operating system.
>
> On 4 April 2015 at 17:17, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 04/04/2015 06:12 AM, Nux! wrote:
> >
> >> 100% with Digimer here.
> >>
> >> I think there are no conspiracy theories. IMO RedHat does not want nor
> >> does it afford to mess up CentOS.
> >>
> >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the project,
> >> testing, helping out community.
> >>
> >> Lucian
> >>
> >>
> >> Agreed, and I want to thank you specifically for the nux dextop repo,
> > which is in my standard installed repo set for EL6 and EL7.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
