Re: VLAN issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 01/25/2015 04:20 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as
the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the
native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets.

That's not a mistake, per se. Having vlan 48 as the native vlan just means that you'd want 192.168.48.100 on eth0 instead of eth0.48.

For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works.

As long as you aren't concerned about the security implications of that host having access to vlan 1, that seems pretty reasonable. The system will get some extra broadcast traffic, but the ethernet card will probably filter those out so that they don't have to be processed.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux