Re: VLAN issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port?
>>
>
> Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan.
>
> A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet
> header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say
> to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but do not strip the tag out".
>
> You can either terminate the VLAN at the switch port (untagged) which will
> strip out the VLAN tag or you can pass the packet containing the VLAN tag
> to the computer or other device(tagged/trunk). This device can then pull
> out the tag. On linux this mechanism is done by an 8021q VLAN interface.
>
> Hope this is useful.
>

Just to add to that - normally if a host only needs to be on one
subnet you would use an access port on the switch to select a single
vlan and deliver those packets untagged so the host does not need to
care about tags or vlan numbers.   And to that end, switches default
to treating everything as access ports on native/untagged vlan 0
unless configured otherwise.   However, if the host needs interfaces
on multiple subnets, you can do it on a single network connection by
giving it a trunk connection from the switch and letting it split out
the vlan interfaces internally.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux