We have lots of servers with a similar setup (i.e. tagged vlans and no
ip on eth0) and this works just fine.
What is the actual vlan configuration on your switchport?
Regards,
Dennis
On 24.01.2015 01:34, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Thanks, makes sense.
>
> I just don't see why I have to effectively waste an extra IP address to get
> my connection established.
>
> Boris.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:10:57PM -0500, Boris Epstein wrote:
>>
>>> This makes two of us. I've done everything as you have described and it
>>> simply does not work.
>>
>> Are you actually seeing VLAN tagged traffic, or is the cisco switch
>> just providing a normal stream?
>>
>> At work we have hundreds of VLANs, but the servers don't get configured
>> for this; we just configure them as normal; ie eth0. The network
>> infrastructure does the VLAN decoding, the server doesn't have to.
>>
>> Try configuring the machine as if it was a real LAN and forget about
>> the VLAN.
>>
>> If that doesn't work then what does 'tcpdump -i eth0' show you?
>>
>> --
>>
>> rgds
>> Stephen
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
