Re: Some thoughts on systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
>> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> 
>>> 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.
> 
>> Well ..  all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we
>> would still have it as CentOS-7 rebuilds RHEL-7 sources.  Debating
>> whether or not systemd is a good idea is not relevant for CentOS.  It is
>> upstream, it is default, therefore it will be installed.  That's just
>> how it is.
> 
> I favour the increased knowledge of what it does and how to use it.
> Surely that is what the Centos Wiki is for ?

Yes it is, feel free to put all your learning about systems into 
improving the wiki also.

> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul.
> England, EU.
> 
>   Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
>   Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux