Re: Some thoughts on systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:

> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:

> > 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.

> Well ..  all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we
> would still have it as CentOS-7 rebuilds RHEL-7 sources.  Debating
> whether or not systemd is a good idea is not relevant for CentOS.  It is
> upstream, it is default, therefore it will be installed.  That's just
> how it is.

I favour the increased knowledge of what it does and how to use it.
Surely that is what the Centos Wiki is for ?


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.

   Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
   Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux