Re: Some thoughts on systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2014-07-18, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But it does force people who should be focusing on improving an
> application to instead spend their time reconfiguring the startup
> configuration for a distribution just to keep it working the same way.

This seems (again) to be moving into a debate on "why systemd", when at
least for CentOS 7 the decision has been made--it's systemd or bust (or
a SIG for removing it).  Perhaps we should focus systemd discussions
more on how we as CentOS users can easily adjust?  (I know, I already
violated this principle in the thread, but I will aim not to in the
future.)

IOW, if people really don't like systemd, I don't think this is a
good forum for that discussion.

--keith

-- 
kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux