On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:34:49PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote> > I think that a lot of these objections are addressed here:
> >
> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken/
>
> Ummm, 'addressed' by pointing out that a whole bunch of the changes
> fedora has made break things that are expected to work in unix-like
> systems. I fail to see how that helps with the problem.
I'm not sure if I'm reading the same page as you are. I could sum up
the response to your objection with two points:
1. systemd works fine with /usr on a separate file system that is not
pre-mounted at boot.
2. Modern linux distributions currently don't work well when /usr is
not pre-mounted at boot, and this has been the case for a while.
Fedora went through a process to try to clean up the mess that Linux
has fallen into, by identifying all the executables in /bin, /sbin,
/etc, /var (etc.) that aren't needed to boot the system, and migrating
them into /usr.
This migration was put into place for reasons unrelated to systemd.
Perhaps you have a valid complaint about this change, but don't lump
it together with your issue with systemd.
--
Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
