On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:46 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
> > Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards).
> >
> > Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ?
> So you are following the thread on the Fedora list? I have been
> ignoring it.
No. I read some of
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_topic&q=systemd
The systemd proponent, advocate and chief developer? wants to
abolish /etc and /var in favour of having the /etc and /var data
in /usr.
Seems a big revolution is being forced on Linux users when stability and
the "same old familiar Linux" is desired by many, including me.
> Best I can tell is learn it and use it. And if you have any services,
> fix them so that they work with systemd. I work with one that does not
> and it is very slow to complete its startup.
I was keenly waiting to upgrade to C7. Perhaps I'll upgrade to C6 and
retain familiar Linux.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
