On 08/07/14 02:22, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:46 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>> Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
>>> Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards).
>>>
>>> Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ?
>
>> So you are following the thread on the Fedora list? I have been
>> ignoring it.
>
> No. I read some of
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_topic&q=systemd
>
> The systemd proponent, advocate and chief developer? wants to
> abolish /etc and /var in favour of having the /etc and /var data
> in /usr.
>
> Seems a big revolution is being forced on Linux users when stability and
> the "same old familiar Linux" is desired by many, including me.
>
It's already started. Some configs have already moved from /etc to /usr
under el7.
Whilst I'm as resistant to change as the next man, I've learned you
can't fight it so best start getting used to it ;-)
>> Best I can tell is learn it and use it. And if you have any services,
>> fix them so that they work with systemd. I work with one that does not
>> and it is very slow to complete its startup.
>
> I was keenly waiting to upgrade to C7. Perhaps I'll upgrade to C6 and
> retain familiar Linux.
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
