Re: Large file system idea

["Richer, Mark (CIV)" <mhricher@xxxxxxx>]

We were using glusterfs for shared home directories and it was really slow. We're using an NFS shared and it's working much faster.

Mark

> On May 18, 2014, at 21:35, "Ted Miller" <tedlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
>> case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.
> 
> How recently have you looked at Gluster?  It has seen some significant 
> progress, though small files are still its weakest area.  I believe that 
> some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.
> 
> Ted Miller
> Elkhart, IN
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos