Re: Large file system idea

[Ted Miller <tedlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
> case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.

How recently have you looked at Gluster?  It has seen some significant 
progress, though small files are still its weakest area.  I believe that 
some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files.

Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos