Re: Large file system idea

[Steve Thompson <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote:

> Have you looked at parallel filesystems such as Lustre and fhgfs?

I have not looked at Lustre, as I have heard many negative things about it 
(including Oracle ownership). The only business using Lustre where I know 
the admins has had a lot of trouble with it. No redundancy.

Fhgfs looks interesting, and I am planning on looking at it, but have
not yet done so.

MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the
case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow.

Steve
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos