Brian T. Brunner wrote on Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:13:43 -0800: > The question was "Hey, REDHAT, *WHY*?" It's not only Red Hat. Suse uses it since 9.0 as the default as well. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: maillists at conactive.com (Kai Schaetzl)
- Date: Wed Nov 30 17:31:37 2005
- In-reply-to: <s38d5f45.021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <s38d5f45.021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Brian T. Brunner
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Prev by Date: CentOS mailserver and spam filter setup ideas & preferences
- Next by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Previous by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Index(es):
 |