Ulrik S. Kofod wrote on Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:51:44 +0100 (CET): > And I still > havent seen an answer to why grub is so great, to me it seems like it doesn't really > work as booting pretty much is the main attaction in boot loaders. The latest grub (which is *not* part of CentoS 4.2) has some pretty interesting features, f.i. recovering from boot failures. Don't know if lilo provides the same. Also, you have to run lilo after each kernel upgrade which isn't necessary for grub. I agree that grub should handle RAID better and do the installation on all disks for you automatically. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: maillists at conactive.com (Kai Schaetzl)
- Date: Wed Nov 30 17:31:44 2005
- In-reply-to: <31851.195.212.29.92.1133365904.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <53242.195.212.29.92.1133363168.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051130092717.rxzoqcrbkckocssc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <31851.195.212.29.92.1133365904.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Ulrik S. Kofod
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- From: Ulrik S. Kofod
- why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Prev by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Previous by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by thread: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Index(es):
 |