why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



The question remains unanswered: WHY was LILO removed?

We/you/they removed *something that works*.

What took its place does not work everywhere LILO does... a functionality loss.

I hear folks saying "that loss is corrected in a future release"

That's saying GRUB is *almost* ready to replace LILO, which has been removed prematurely.

The question was "Hey, REDHAT, *WHY*?"

Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610)796-5838

>>> mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx 11/30/05 10:55AM >>>
Nielsen, Steve wrote:
> I meant not a visible choice by default :).
> 
> Thanks for the tip.  I was not aware of making it visible in that way.
> 
> So at the prompt you type:
> 
> "boot: lilo" ?
> 

boot: linux lilo

- K
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux