On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:48 PM, ashkab rahmani <ashkan82r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > thank you very much. what do you think abou jfs?? > is it comparable with others?? I was very pro-JFS... until I lost 10gig of very important data, and back then (2002) there was no way to recover a JFS volume (the data was in RAID, but some corruption ocurred and I lost the whole drive, I mean, I ended up with a blank root). Back in 2004 I asked one of the IBMers at the JFS team about it and he had this to say: ----- "IBM will continue to invest in jfs as long as we feel that our customers get value from it." Q: Will JFS be enhanced eventually with features from ReiserFS 4? (can it be done without a complete rewrite?). "Possibly some. Samba has been asking for streams support for a while, and if reiser4 leads the way in an implementation that does not break unix file semantics, jfs (and possibly other file systems) may follow." ----- Dunno if IBM did much to JFS after that... haven´t been following their work wrt JFS... FC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos