On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So be careful with BTRFS until it was in wide use for at least 4 years.
FUD alert...
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/bo
---
LinuxCon Japan 2012 | Presentations
On The Way to a Healthy Btrfs Towards Enterprise
Btrfs has been on full development for about 5 years and it does make
lots of progress on both feature and performance, but why does
everybody keep tagging it with ""experimental""? And why do people
still think of it as a vulnerable one for production use? As a goal of
production use, we have been strengthening several features, making
improvements on performance and keeping fixing bugs to make btrfs
stable, for instance, ""snapshot aware defrag"", ""extent buffer
cache"", ""rbtree lock contention"", etc. This talk will cover the
above and will also show problems we are facing with, solutions we are
seeking for and a blueprint we are planning to lay out. For this
session, I'll focus on its features and performance, so for the target
audience, it'd be better to have a basic knowledge base of filesystem.
Liu Bo, Fujitsu
Liu Bo has been working on linux kernel development since late 2010 as
a Fujitsu engineer. He has been working on filesystem field and he's
now focusing on btrfs development.
----
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un
Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
