thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario.
but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true?
———
Ashkan R
On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" <nux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> > hello
> > i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
> > i want to share it on network via nfs.
> > which file system is better for it?
> > thank you
> > ———
> > Ashkan R
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> No redundancy? That's a lot of data to lose. :-)
>
> As for your question, I'd use ext4. It has caught up a lot with XFS and
> it's THE file system supported by RHEL and Fedora.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
