On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tony Mountifield wrote:
>> In article
>> <CALKwpEyuPRU5Az9xU_d_BrJc0m_E9XDLH1T5iuB2U8rvRZevTg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were
>>> trying to prevent other companies (like Oracle and Novell) who were
>>> providing support to RHEL customers at reduced rates. They have never
>>> said they were concerned with the free clones and in fact have helped
>>> CentOS many times in the past (according to statements from the core
>>> developers).
>>>
>>> Redhat knows that the free distros help them maintain market share,
>>> and gain customers who need full support eventually. The issues
>>> CentOS are seeing are simply collateral damage to the larger war
>>> against the other big companies who are trying to provide services by
>>> cheating.
>>
>> Except that the other day, Johnny posted this:
>>
>>> I can tell you that we have been contacted by upstream to make sure we
>>> **UNDERSTAND** the new AUP restrictions on distribution. I can also
>>> tell you that we (CentOS) are doing everything in our power to meet the
>>> restrictions as they were explained to us.
>>
>> which sounds like RH making it clear that their changes are aimed at
>> CentOS too.
>
> This sounds more like a butt covering exercise by lawyers, remember this all
> comes from the USA where there are FAR TOO MANY lawyers.
> To be able to enforce a possible claim under this AUP restriction, they will
> need to show that those involved with use of the code, under this new
> clause, understand and have been communicated with.......etc.
> As I said, a butt covering exercise - rather than any expressed attempt at
> intimidation or enforcement - just my $0.01 worth.
I know it's more fun to blame the evil lawyers for everything, but it
sounds more like they respect the project and took special effort to
reach out and make sure they were aware and fully understood the
changes. That is far more likely given the history and widespread
usage of CentOS.
-☙ Brian Mathis ❧-
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
