Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



In article <CALKwpEyuPRU5Az9xU_d_BrJc0m_E9XDLH1T5iuB2U8rvRZevTg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> When Redhat announced the changes they made it very clear they were
> trying to prevent other companies (like Oracle and Novell) who were
> providing support to RHEL customers at reduced rates.  They have never
> said they were concerned with the free clones and in fact have helped
> CentOS many times in the past (according to statements from the core
> developers).
> 
> Redhat knows that the free distros help them maintain market share,
> and gain customers who need full support eventually.  The issues
> CentOS are seeing are simply collateral damage to the larger war
> against the other big companies who are trying to provide services by
> cheating.

Except that the other day, Johnny posted this:

> I can tell you that we have been contacted by upstream to make sure we
> **UNDERSTAND** the new AUP restrictions on distribution.  I can also
> tell you that we (CentOS) are doing everything in our power to meet the
> restrictions as they were explained to us.

which sounds like RH making it clear that their changes are aimed at CentOS too.

Pity... perhaps RH have had a change of manager somewhere...

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux