Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 01/11/11 18:27, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> David Miller wrote
> ---------------------------
>
> You can go with the self support option. Seeing you are willing to go with CentOS as long
> as there are timely updates. That tells me you dont really care about getting "support" from
>    the vendor. You can pick up workstation self support for $50 and server for $350 a year.
>    That means you will get all the updates but just can't call or open tickets with Redhat.
>    The limitations imposed by Redhat for "Support" they will provide are artificial.
>    Although Redhat says it will only support 2 sockets and x amount of virtual guests you can still do it.
>
> ---------------------------
>   From what I saw on the redhat site they have also taken away that
> support/subscription model.
> They have standard support as minimum, for me it would be 4,000+ or more
> for my 2 little non-commercial servers...forget it.
>

First option, Desktop Self-support Subscription (1 year) $49:

https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/desktop/


First option, Server Self-support Subscription (1 year) $349

https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/server/


A 2 socket virtualization platform is $1,999 giving unlimited virtual 
guests.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux