Re: CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/19/11, whitivery <co55-sy1t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, but I don't think that this is the issue.
> Otherwise bonding failover wouldn't work at all.  When enslaved in order
> eth1 eth0, bonding and link detection work properly - with eth0 set as
> primary, I pull the eth0 cable, it switches to eth1; plug eth0 back in, it
> switches back to it; pull the eth1 cable, it knows there's no fallback.
> So the link detection seems fine.

Ok, that does eliminate eth0 link detection as the source of the
problem. I think you might have to ask on another mailing list. It
seems like it should be the kernel list but not 100% certain.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux