Re: What happened to 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Steve Walsh <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Except.
>
> If you have a 6.0 machine, and enable the cr/ repo, then you don't just
> get the 6.0 updates. You get most of the post-6.0 updates, plus what's
> been built for 6.1 (effectively still in QA), plus some post 6.1 updates
> (Again, still in QA). As far as I'm aware, there's now way to say "Just
> give me the 6.0 updates you have" when using the cr/ repo.
>
> I am more than happy to be corrected on this operation of the cr repo
> tho, as I've held off on updating boxes with the cr/ repo so as not to
> get "untested" updates.

The best policy is to stay with 5.7.
Why would anyone want to use 6.x with the issue?
All my boxes are still 5.7.

Newer version doesn't mean better software.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux