Re: CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/13/11, whitivery <co55-sy1t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Eth0 is the onboard device, using an updated VIA Velocity driver
>>(velocityget 1.42 instead of default via-velocity):
>>
>>05:00.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6120/VT6121/VT6122
>>Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 82)
>>
>>Eth1 is a Linksys (Cisco) USB300M USB-Ethernet dongle, using asix
>>driver:

Have you tried adding another Ethernet adapter? This is because I was
reading the bonding doc and towards the end there was this part

>As discussed in the options section, above, some drivers do
>not support the netif_carrier_on/_off link state tracking system.
>With use_carrier enabled, bonding will always see these links as up,
>regardless of their actual state.

So it might a driver issue, i.e. the VIA driver is not reporting the
link down correctly.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux