Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS. Kai _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:42:48 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTinSvCM5_0LfSZa+6bD7T=WN9fY6ZOws8kpm0ppf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Lamar Owen
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- References:
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Larry Vaden
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Prev by Date: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Next by Date: Re: ipsec with ipv4 and ipv6 not working
- Previous by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Next by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Index(es):
 |