On Thursday, February 10, 2011 06:42:48 am Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on > the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS. While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL; thus it's on-topic for this list, unless it needs to be kept on an EPEL list. I personally would rather the quick report show up here than to have to subscribe to yet another mailing list. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:01:52 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <VA.00003c02.006ebd8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: PARI
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- References:
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Prev by Date: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Next by Date: Re: High Availability and Storage Cluster
- Previous by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Next by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Index(es):
 |