On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lucian <lucian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Better behavior with extensive autofs tables. (Older mock, in my
>> experience, gets very confused and starts force unmounting direct
>> automount targets in the midst of processing, which is *nasty* and
>> disables my home directory in my fairly odd setup.) Also, the
>> 'lastlog' tables and other sparse files make for *much* too large of
>> cache.tar.gz files. See this bug
>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633435)
>
> Interesting, maybe I will give the testing version a shot. Thanks.
I'd love to see it backported to CentOS 'extras' or 'build' setups.
It's a better tool and supports more releases, including hooks now for
CentOS 6 when it is published. (The hooks assume that CentOS 6 will
live in the same location as CentOS 5, just a different '%releasever'.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
