Re: noob question about mock

[Lucian <lucian@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Better behavior with extensive autofs tables. (Older mock, in my
> experience, gets very confused and starts force unmounting direct
> automount targets in the midst of processing, which is *nasty* and
> disables my home directory in my fairly odd setup.) Also, the
> 'lastlog' tables and other sparse files make for *much* too large of
> cache.tar.gz files. See this bug
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633435)

Interesting, maybe I will give the testing version a shot. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos