On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:59 -0500, John Quaglieri wrote:
> I take it 3.3 will eventually be unsupported and the mirrors will
> symlink 3.3 -> 3.4 which will force the upgrade to happen? Is 3.3 still
> recieving security updates?
3.3 is receiving security updates, yes. At some point, 3.3 will point
to 3.4 (or maybe 3.5 if there are no problems with that upgrade).
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 20:59 -0500, John Quaglieri wrote:
> >
> > The process of upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4 can leave DNS servers running
> > bind broken ... so we are not going to automatically upgrade people.
> >
> > New installs of CentOS-3.4 are not affected, and if you are not running
> > bind, a manual upgrade from 3.3 to 3.4 does not break anything.
> >
> > If you are manually upgrading a DNS server, make sure to remove caching-
> > nameserver first and restore your /etc/named.conf
> > and /var/named/named.ca have been restored. After the upgrade,
> > do /etc/init.d/named restart and do "chkconfig --level 345 named on"
> >
> > Hopefully this situation will be addressed by the upstream provider
> > soon.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050311/1f7ed6b0/attachment.bin
