On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Novell sale news?
>
> On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
>>>>
>>> It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
>>> source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
>>> CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question.
>>
>> well, ok :)
>>
>> but it would still be nice to see what people think about a
>> centos-social or a centos-offtopic or a centos-chatter list.
>
> What we need is a "What would a good sysadmin think?" list where one of the
> criteria for being a good sysadmin would obviously be that you know something
> about Centos but the rest of the scope covers applications, conversions, product
> comparisons, legal issues, etc. The kind of stuff most of us do every day...
Sounds OK to me.
Keith
--
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
in practice they are not.
This email was sent from my laptop with Centos 5.5
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
