On Wed, Nov 24, 2010, Toralf Lund wrote:
>Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>
>>>> That's going back to the character-mode days. I meant the GUI version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I used an X11 version on some Unix variant a long time ago - possibly
>>> IRIX, but it may have been the DEC one (or both.) This was several years
>>>
>>
>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
>>
>It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
>source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
>CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question.
I find lists where there's fairly open discussion of topics more
useful than those that deal with very narrow topics. It's
amazing how many times I learn something useful that I never
would have seen on a restricted list (e.g. I learned about the
Mac RSS reader NetNewsWire on a local Linux group list).
If a topic is uninteresting, ctrl-d with mutt on the thread nukes
it quickly.
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax: (206) 232-9186 Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792
Anyone who thinks Microsoft never does anything truly innovative isn't
paying attention to the part of the company that pushes the state of
its art: Microsoft's legal department.
--Ed Foster, InfoWorld Gripe Line columnist
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
