Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 10:32 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>>> That's going back to the character-mode days. I meant the GUI version.
>>>
>>>
>> I used an X11 version on some Unix variant a long time ago - possibly
>> IRIX, but it may have been the DEC one (or both.) This was several years
>>
>
> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
>
It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question.
Apart from that, it's sometimes hard to resist commenting on obviously
incorrect statements even in an off-topic thread...
- T
> If there is enough interest to build a social sort of list around the
> centos community, we can always fire up a centos-chatter or
> centos-social mailing list. Doing this on irc has been, imho, most
> successful.
>
> - KB
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, forward, copy, print or rely on this e-mail in any way except as permitted by the author.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
