On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 18:55, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> > I pointed out that when I was testing Evolution it didn't work
> > right even on its own. Admittedly that was a version or two ago
> > and I haven't tried the reminder notifications lately.
>
> With Evolution or Exchange?
When I tried using the evolution calendar some time ago it would
regularly stop poping up the reminders for days at a time, then
sometimes try to catch up with all of them at once.
> > When someone shows me the scheduling server that can be
> > transparently replaced with a different type because both
> > use only standard protocols this argument will mean something.
>
> ??? I thought I basically laid that out with OpenGroupware.ORG
> (OGo) ???
Modifying every client isn't my idea of transparent.
> I'm still trying to figure out what you mean ... you're liking holding
> up much, much higher standards than for Exchange-Outlook.
I don't see any particular reason to change from one system
where you are locked in to using a specific server or change
all your clients to another system where you are equally locked
in to a different specific server. When full-featured groupware
works with wire-level standards so the clients don't notice
if you change the server as you can do with email now, there
will be a compelling reason to dump the others.
> > I just want them to drive on the same road.
>
> That's like saying you want them to be on the same network, but they
> don't talk to each other. ;->
Evolution talking to the same server as outlook is better
than nothing. If/when an assortment of clients and servers use
common wire level standard protocols it will be even better.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
