On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 20:54 -0700, Todd Cary wrote:
> Ignacio -
>
> Thank you! Currently, I am running RH 9 for testing php apps and for
> ftp to my clients. On my "play" box, I have FC 3, but I would like to
> have something solid running on it so that I can migrate everything
> over to the "play" box while I install something that is more current
> on the production box and migrate everything back.
Fedora 3 is fine for a temporary machine; there's nothing "wrong" with
it. CentOS 4 and Fedora 3 are mostly at parity, but CentOS's longer
lifecycle makes it a better choice for servers or corporate desktops
that you don't want to upgrade every year.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://centos.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050729/1bcdc552/attachment.bin
