On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 14:45 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> >
> > > .... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD
> > > ....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't
> > > figure these out, so here goes:
> > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> > > 2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution,
> > > or periodically re-sync ?
> > >
> >
> > Oh ... so we are totally synced (pretty much the maximum allowed by
> > trademark law) ... and we remain that way (at least in the base and
> > updates repos) all the time.
> >
> > If you compare the centos-announce list:
> >
> > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
> >
> > with the RHEL-4 errata list:
> >
> > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html
> >
> > You will see that security updates are done, usually within 24 hours, of
> > any security release upstream.
> >
> > When the Quarterly updates are done (now 2-4 times a year), we release
> > the Security updates (RHSAs) immediately ... the Re-spinning of the ISOs
> > usually takes 1-2 weeks to totally test out and release.
> >
>
>
> This makes the most sense, leveraging on LNAELV AMAP, but I was
> unclear from reading the 4.n blurb on the website, thanks.
>
William (and everyone else too)
I have been reworking some of the info on the website (FAQs, About
CentOS, etc.) ... is it more clear now?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050705/0ad192af/attachment.bin
