Johnny Hughes wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:38 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
>
>>.... I am new to this list (got referred here from the fedora list, COLD
>>....) and have a few questions. I poked around CentOS.org & couldn't
>>figure these out, so here goes:
>>
>>
>
><snip>
>
>
>
>>2. Does CentOS plan to branch permanently away from LNAELV distribution,
>>or periodically re-sync ?
>>
>>
>
>Oh ... so we are totally synced (pretty much the maximum allowed by
>trademark law) ... and we remain that way (at least in the base and
>updates repos) all the time.
>
>If you compare the centos-announce list:
>
>http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/
>
>with the RHEL-4 errata list:
>
>https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html
>
>You will see that security updates are done, usually within 24 hours, of
>any security release upstream.
>
>When the Quarterly updates are done (now 2-4 times a year), we release
>the Security updates (RHSAs) immediately ... the Re-spinning of the ISOs
>usually takes 1-2 weeks to totally test out and release.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
This makes the most sense, leveraging on LNAELV AMAP, but I was unclear
from reading the 4.n blurb on the website, thanks.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember, ignorance is bliss, but
willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050703/d71b25b5/attachment.htm
