On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 10:01, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > I'd normally suggest you ensure you're connecting to an EHCI > port with USBView (or Device Manager in Windows XP), but > you've already stated that you had good performance in > Windows XP. > > The only other thing I can suggest, which really isn't an > answer, is to use FireWire. I've never had any performance > issues, period. And there's no worrying whether or not you > are connected to an OHCI or EHCI port, how well the driver > handles memory mapped I/O for the target side, etc... > > FireWire was designed for block transfer devices, with > intelligence allowing direct device-to-device transfers. USB > was designed for character devices and programmed I/O, EHCI > wasn't supposed to exist (but exists more out of Intel's > refusal to license IEEE1394 -- long, long story -- which has > affected adoption as well). What Linux kernel versions have you used with firewire? The last 2 fedora FC4 updates broke disk access completely. FC3 sort-of works, but when I leave a RAID1 mirror running with an IDE partition and a firewire partition mirrored, within a few hours of activity either the machine will crash or the firewire partition will be kicked out of the RAID. I haven't tried Centos because you need the unsupported kernel and I didn't have much hope for that being better than any of the fedoras. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx