slow usb hard disk performance.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Bryan J. Smith wrote:

>Robert <kerplop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>
>>    for dir in bin boot etc home initrd lib lost+found misc
>>opt root \
>>               sbin selinux srv tftpboot \
>>               usr var ; do
>>      find /$dir -depth -print0 | cpio --null -pmd $UD/$DT
>>      echo `date` Completed: /$dir >>$PF
>>    done
>>    
>>
>
>That's not a good benchmark.  You're adding the overhead of
>inode/tree traversal and all sorts of other factors.  You're
>easily cutting performance by 2-3x over.
>
>Since USB 2.0 EHCI is capable of only 60MBps (480Mbps)
>theoretical, and Intel openly admits that only 30MBps is
>realistic, 8.8MBps is not unreasonable for this command.
>
>Try a "raw" dd from /dev/zero, that is at least 2x your
>memory:  
>  dd if=/dev/zero of=(some file) bs=8M count=1000
>
>Or consider a bonnie benchmark.
>  
>
I wasn't complaining, Bryan, simply responding.  Actually, having moved 
from a DAT-2 drive to the USB-connected disk, I'm happy as a pig in sh*t 
to be able to backup the whole thing unattended and have a reasonable 
expectation that the resulting wad of crud is good! (I'm still gonna 
burn /boot, /root, /home and /etc to DVD once a month, though.)
Have a great day!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051205/9db01183/attachment.htm

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux