-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In fairness think that is outside the terms of Redhat's the support
contract. Redhat only support ext3 currently.
John
Peter Farrow wrote:
| I had an Issue with RH9 and contacted Red Hat support, once I finally
| got to speak to a support "professional" I was fobbed off in a most
| unprofessional manner and spoken down to as well. Incidentally they
| never off a remedy for the particular bug either at the time, which was
| if you installed a Red Hat box with a Reiserfs file system (linux
| reiserfs), the RH9 upgrade install does not spot any linux partitions to
| upgrade, - pretty shit big time bug if you ask me, basically they
| insinuated I was a moron for using reiserfs.
|
| So I would call it a shit house support too. ;-)
|
| P.
|
|
| John Newbigin wrote:
|
|> When I first started CentOS-2 I purchased RHEL21ES out of my own
|> pocket because I wanted to make sure that CentOS-2 was as close to the
|> real product as possible.
|>
|> I was most unimpressed with the RH support. In fact I would call it
|> shit house. For a list of bugs see
|> http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/centos-2/index.htm
|>
|> The one time I called telephone support I got transfered to some
|> American call center who could not understand a thing I said
|> (obviously in my harsh Australian accent) and in the end I gave up.
|> Needless to say I don't pay them shit anymore and I just do everything
|> myself.
|>
|> From my observations, there is no such thing as support from RedHat.
|>
|> John.
|>
|> Collins Richey wrote:
|>
|>> As a parallel question to my thread about CentOS for commercial use,
|>> here's a question I've been wondering about.
|>>
|>> How many of you who have RHEL licenses and paid support licenses have
|>> ever needed actually to request support? And if you did was the
|>> support any bit more timely or accurate than community support for
|>> CentOS or other distros?
|>>
|>
|>
|
| _______________________________________________
| CentOS mailing list
| CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
| http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCUlFiHgDLUzVQ7OARAmybAKDRb1v9/Q7FuPi9f7W/HHwvRyZrAgCgqxdD
9lCuaYbrSVXNifAgVeDVI+c=
=2aqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
******************************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please note that emails to, from and within RT? may be subject to the Freedom
of Information Act 1997 and may be liable to disclosure.
******************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: johnm.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050405/37f22046/johnm.vcf
