> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Johnny Hughes > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:39 AM > To: centos-virt@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) > packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing > > On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > >> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan@xxxxxx > >>> <mailto:nathan@xxxxxx>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago > on this > >>> list, > >>> > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > >>> > > >>> > Call trace looks similar.. > >>> > >>> Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > >>> into it. > >>> > >>> Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > >>> upgraded > >>> this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > >>> <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > >>> Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and > does > >>> have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > >>> removed? > >>> > >>> In the meantime, I'll revert the kernel and follow up if I see any > >>> further > >>> problems. > >>> > >>> > >>> IIRC the patch has been removed from the spec file because it has been > >>> merged upstream in 4.9.71. > >> > >> The IRC discussion I found in my log indicates that it was removed > >> because it didn't apply cleanly due to changes when updating to 4.9.75, > >> yet I don't think anyone independently validated that the changes made > >> are equivalent to the patch that was removed. I was never able to > >> reproduce this issue, so I didn't investigate it myself. > >> > > > > Sounds like the patch is still needed :) > > > > Anyone up to re-porting it to 4.9.75+ ? > > It looked, at first glance, like 4.9.71 fixed it .. I guess not in all cases I'm happy to do testing here if anyone's able to help with a patch, does look like reverting to 4.9.63-29 solved it for me in the interm. _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
