On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan@xxxxxx > > <mailto:nathan@xxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this > > list, > > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > > into it. > > > > Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > > upgraded > > this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > > <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > > Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does > > have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > > removed? > > > > In the meantime, I'll revert the kernel and follow up if I see any > > further > > problems. > > > > > > IIRC the patch has been removed from the spec file because it has been > > merged upstream in 4.9.71. > > The IRC discussion I found in my log indicates that it was removed > because it didn't apply cleanly due to changes when updating to 4.9.75, > yet I don't think anyone independently validated that the changes made > are equivalent to the patch that was removed. I was never able to > reproduce this issue, so I didn't investigate it myself. > Sounds like the patch is still needed :) Anyone up to re-porting it to 4.9.75+ ? -- Pasi > -- > Kevin Stange > Chief Technology Officer > Steadfast | Managed Infrastructure, Datacenter and Cloud Services > 800 S Wells, Suite 190 | Chicago, IL 60607 > 312.602.2689 X203 | Fax: 312.602.2688 > kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.steadfast.net _______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
