----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Neary" <dneary@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Mail list for wiki articles" <centos-docs@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:42:06 PM > Subject: Re: Docs strategy and tactics [RFC] > > Hi, > > On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > > On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > >> what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > >> different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > >> away from the wiki to another medium? > > > > That's a good question, and I don't have it answered. :) It has to do > > with our intention/thinking as a group. > > Providing feedback from another project where the website is backed by > Git, and the workflow for user contributions is documented > http://manageiq.org > > At the foot of every page is a link "Edit this page on github" (eg: > http://manageiq.org/documentation/ ). > > It's been a while since I looked, but my experience was that there were > very few clicks through to edit and PRs. Anecdotally, people didn't > realise they could propose edits this way. > > Prominent wiki-like controls are important to getting drive-by edits, > and I am personally a fan of the in-place editing experience you get > from a good wiki. Good info. Different strokes, etc., only way to judge is through results. Wikis are certainly a well-known sort of tool, if ppl don't realize they can make a change, they definitely won't. > > Thanks, > Dave. > > -- > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy > Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com > Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
