Hi, On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs >> what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit >> different. Or is this development the first step in the transition >> away from the wiki to another medium? > > That's a good question, and I don't have it answered. :) It has to do > with our intention/thinking as a group. Providing feedback from another project where the website is backed by Git, and the workflow for user contributions is documented http://manageiq.org At the foot of every page is a link "Edit this page on github" (eg: http://manageiq.org/documentation/ ). It's been a while since I looked, but my experience was that there were very few clicks through to edit and PRs. Anecdotally, people didn't realise they could propose edits this way. Prominent wiki-like controls are important to getting drive-by edits, and I am personally a fan of the in-place editing experience you get from a good wiki. Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
