Info on open source CGL4.0

[florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx (Florian Heigl)]

Hi,

On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:

> Hello Shiva, Florian and all,
> 
> On 2010-01-27 T 15:38 +0100 Florian Heigl wrote:
> 
>> all CGL compliance efforts by pure OSS distros have silently
>> died a few years ago, both because it is a quite challenging
>> task to undertake and maybe also due to some discouraging /
>> inpolite posts on here.
>> 
>> some like the half-commercial SUSE CGL seems to be dead, too
>> and Motorola HA-Linux seems to not have seen any updates.
> 
> I am surprised to hear that the CGL for SUSE Linux Enterprise
> "seems to be dead" - the opposite is the case:-) with SUSE Linux
> Enterprise 11 and the upcoming SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 Service
> Pack 1 family of products (Server, High Availability Extension,
> ..) we are working towards a broad implementation and improved
> compliance with the Carrier Grade Linux specification.


that is great news.
There's no more mention of SLES at this list (because the registration is still pending, or why?)
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/cgl/registered-distributions and the latest
marketing pdf I had around was like for SuSE 9 :)

Thank you very much for correcting that.

Florian